#jython IRC Log

Index

IRC Log for 2016-01-19

Timestamps are in GMT/BST.

[3:18] * robbyoconnor (~wakawaka@guifications/user/r0bby) Quit (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
[3:18] * robbyoconnor (~wakawaka@guifications/user/r0bby) has joined #jython
[3:18] * robbyoconnor (~wakawaka@guifications/user/r0bby) Quit (Client Quit)
[3:20] * robbyoconnor (~wakawaka@guifications/user/r0bby) has joined #jython
[9:49] * srcerer (~chatzilla@dns2.klsairexpress.com) Quit (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
[10:41] * Arfrever (~Arfrever@apache/committer/Arfrever) Quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
[12:34] <topi`> jimbaker: what kind of a reactor do you have in mind?
[12:35] <topi`> it's clear that the java platform is quite different from select() and friends
[13:22] * Arfrever (~Arfrever@apache/committer/Arfrever) has joined #jython
[13:22] * ChanServ sets mode +o Arfrever
[14:40] * fwierzbicki (~Adium@99-106-169-5.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net) has joined #jython
[14:42] * fwierzbicki1 (~Adium@99-106-169-5.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net) Quit (Ping timeout: 256 seconds)
[15:21] * xemdetia (xemdetia@nat/ibm/x-acejehydltpularf) has joined #jython
[18:35] * ztane (ztane@lakka.kapsi.fi) Quit (Ping timeout: 255 seconds)
[18:36] * ztane (ztane@lakka.kapsi.fi) has joined #jython
[18:37] <agronholm> jimbaker: are you aware of the upcoming pip 8.0 release?
[18:38] <agronholm> it should be right around the corner
[19:03] * srcerer (~chatzilla@dns2.klsairexpress.com) has joined #jython
[19:04] * srcerer (~chatzilla@dns2.klsairexpress.com) Quit (Client Quit)
[19:05] * srcerer (~chatzilla@dns2.klsairexpress.com) has joined #jython
[21:38] <jimbaker> agronholm, i have not tracked
[21:39] <jimbaker> i suppose we should test, very shortly. and hopefully they will be getting out upstream updates
[21:39] <jimbaker> distlib has been updated, just a question of setuptools when i looked a week ago
[21:39] <jimbaker> *our* upstream updates
[21:40] <jimbaker> topi`, i mean a reactor that is based on netty. there's no need to go through the emulation layer for c-style socket/select/ssl if we can go against netty directly
[21:40] <jimbaker> should be much better performance, especially for large number of sockets
[21:50] <jimbaker> nickmbailey, any feedback from TomA on http://bugs.jython.org/issue2441 ? we think we have a better solution for his problem

Index

These logs were automatically created by JythonLogBot on irc.freenode.net using a slightly modified version of the Java IRC LogBot.